English
HomeAboutModelsPricingSupport

Qwen3.5-Plus vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.

Qwen3.5-Plus comes from Alibaba and Mistral Medium 3.5 from Mistral. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.

Qwen3.5-Plus holds more in a single conversation — 1M tokens against 262K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.

Qwen3.5-Plus is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.40 / 1M tokens.

SpecificationQwen3.5-PlusMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderAlibabaMistral
Model IDqwen3.5-plusmistral-medium-latest
Context window1M262K
Max output64K—
Input price$0.40 / 1M tokens$1.50 / 1M tokens
Output price$2.40 / 1M tokens$7.50 / 1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff——
Input typestext, image, videotext, image
Output typestexttext
PlanAll paid plansAll paid plans

Which should you use?

Pick Qwen3.5-Plus when…

  • You need the larger context window — 1M against 262K.
  • Cost matters: input runs at $0.40 / 1M tokens versus $1.50 / 1M tokens.
  • You want longer single responses — up to 64K output tokens.
  • You need video input, which the other model does not accept.
Qwen3.5-Plus details

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when…

  • You prefer Mistral's tone and formatting for your work.
Mistral Medium 3.5 details

Related comparisons

Qwen3.5-Plus vs Command A ReasoningQwen3.5-Plus vs Command AQwen3.5-Plus vs MiniMax M2Qwen3.5-Plus vs SonarQwen3.5-Plus vs Sonar Pro

Try both on Clade

You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Qwen3.5-Plus, Mistral Medium 3.5, and every other model on the platform.