MiniMax M2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
MiniMax M2 comes from MiniMax and Mistral Medium 3.5 from Mistral. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Mistral Medium 3.5 holds more in a single conversation — 262K tokens against 197K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiniMax M2 is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.30 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | MiniMax M2 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Mistral |
| Model ID | MiniMax-M2 | mistral-medium-latest |
| Context window | 197K | 262K |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input price | $0.30 / 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $1.20 / 1M tokens | $7.50 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, file | text, image |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | All paid plans | All paid plans |
Which should you use?
Pick MiniMax M2 when…
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.30 / 1M tokens versus $1.50 / 1M tokens.
- You want longer single responses — up to 10K output tokens.
- You need file input, which the other model does not accept.
Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when…
- You need the larger context window — 262K against 197K.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you MiniMax M2, Mistral Medium 3.5, and every other model on the platform.