MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.7-Plus
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes from Xiaomi and Qwen3.7-Plus from Alibaba. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash holds more in a single conversation — 1.0M tokens against 1M — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.14 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba |
| Model ID | mimo-v2.6-flash | qwen3.7-plus |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input price | $0.14 / 1M tokens | $0.40 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28 / 1M tokens | $1.60 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, video, audio | text, image, video |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | All paid plans | All paid plans |
Which should you use?
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when…
- You need the larger context window — 1.0M against 1M.
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.14 / 1M tokens versus $0.40 / 1M tokens.
- You want longer single responses — up to 128K output tokens.
- You need audio input, which the other model does not accept.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you MiMo-V2.6-Flash, Qwen3.7-Plus, and every other model on the platform.