MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes from Xiaomi and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash from DeepSeek. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash holds more in a single conversation — 1.0M tokens against 1M — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.14 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | DeepSeek |
| Model ID | mimo-v2.6-flash | deepseek-flash |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 384K |
| Input price | $0.14 / 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28 / 1M tokens | $1.20 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, video, audio | text, image |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | All paid plans | All paid plans |
Which should you use?
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when…
- You need the larger context window — 1.0M against 1M.
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.14 / 1M tokens versus $0.30 / 1M tokens.
- You need video and audio input, which the other model does not accept.
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when…
- You want longer single responses — up to 384K output tokens.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you MiMo-V2.6-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, and every other model on the platform.