Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
Gemini 3.6 Flash comes from Google and MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Gemini 3.6 Flash holds more in a single conversation — 1.0M tokens against 256K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
MiMo-V2-Flash is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.10 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | Gemini 3.6 Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Model ID | gemini-3.6-flash | mimo-v2-flash |
| Context window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 64K |
| Input price | $1.50 / 1M tokens | $0.10 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $7.50 / 1M tokens | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, file, audio, video | text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | Free | Premium |
Which should you use?
Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when…
- You need the larger context window — 1.0M against 256K.
- You want longer single responses — up to 66K output tokens.
- You need image and file and audio and video input, which the other model does not accept.
- You are on the free plan — this model is included without an upgrade.
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash when…
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.10 / 1M tokens versus $1.50 / 1M tokens.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Gemini 3.6 Flash, MiMo-V2-Flash, and every other model on the platform.