Qwen3.7-Plus vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Side-by-side specs, pricing and capabilities. Both models run on Clade under one subscription, so you can switch between them in the same conversation.
Qwen3.7-Plus comes from Alibaba and Claude Haiku 4.5 from Anthropic. The practical difference for most people is context, price, and which input types each one accepts.
Qwen3.7-Plus holds more in a single conversation — 1M tokens against 200K — which matters for long documents and large codebases.
Qwen3.7-Plus is the cheaper of the two on input tokens at $0.40 / 1M tokens.
| Specification | Qwen3.7-Plus | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Model ID | qwen3.7-plus | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Context window | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input price | $0.40 / 1M tokens | $1.00 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $1.60 / 1M tokens | $5.00 / 1M tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Input types | text, image, video | text, image, file |
| Output types | text | text |
| Plan | All paid plans | All paid plans |
Which should you use?
Pick Qwen3.7-Plus when…
- You need the larger context window — 1M against 200K.
- Cost matters: input runs at $0.40 / 1M tokens versus $1.00 / 1M tokens.
- You need video input, which the other model does not accept.
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when…
- You want longer single responses — up to 64K output tokens.
- You need file input, which the other model does not accept.
Related comparisons
Try both on Clade
You do not have to choose. One Clade subscription gives you Qwen3.7-Plus, Claude Haiku 4.5, and every other model on the platform.